exit, voice, and Loyalty: turtber Reflections cises in interdisciplinary imperialism can be genuinely enlightening, only a small part of my work has been of this particular kind. In fact, in much of Exit, Voice, and Loyalty I have been guilty, not of imperialist ambition or . So, in this time 4 Hirschman, Loyalty p 79 5 Excerpt from Chapter Eight, Exit, Voice and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations and States, p , Summer 6 Ibid. p 82 7 The Loyalty Research Canter, Šbltadwin.ru p 1. access 17 the employee uses voice to gain support from the firm and Estimated Reading Time: 11 mins. As exit often undercuts voice while being unable to counteract decline, loyalty is seen in the function of retarding exit and of permitting voice to play its proper role. The interplay of the three concepts turns out to illuminate a wide range of economic, social, and political phenomena. As the author states in the preface, “having found my.
Albert Hirschman's contribution in Exit, voice, and loyalty provided a framework within which investigators could simultaneously examine people's responses to deteriorating organizational performance and administrators' responses to members' or customers' responses. Traditional analyses focussed on exits — people ceasing to buy a firm's products or leaving the organization — and on. loyalty, and neglect differ along dimensions of constructiveness versus de- structiveness and activity versus passivity (see Figure 1). Voice and loyalty are constructive responses in which an individual attempts to revive or maintain satisfactory employment conditions, whereas exit and neglect are more destructive. Hirschman's () exit, voice, and loyalty framework draws attention to both economic and political behavior as instruments for organizational change. The framework is simple but powerful; it has stimulated much cross-disciplinary analysis and debate. This paper extends this analysis by examining normative implications of Hirschman's basic premise: that exit and voice are primarily mechanisms.
In his recent review of Albert O. Hirschman's book Exit, Voice, and Loyalty Brian Barry suggested that the next step was ‘to look more systematically at ways in which exit and voice can be related, and to try and bring all the variables relevant to each kind of relationship into an explicit theoretical structure.’. As exit often undercuts voice while being unable to counteract decline, loyalty is seen in the function of retarding exit and of permitting voice to play its proper role. The interplay of the three concepts turns out to illuminate a wide range of economic, social, and political phenomena. As the author states in the preface, “having found my. exit, voice, and Loyalty: turtber Reflections cises in interdisciplinary imperialism can be genuinely enlightening, only a small part of my work has been of this particular kind. In fact, in much of Exit, Voice, and Loyalty I have been guilty, not of imperialist ambition or designs, but rather of the opposite: namely, of the desire.
0コメント